Years ago, lawyers were professionals and prepared to work in court trials or to work as independent professionals. However, this trend today has changed significantly, as many choose to work in the corporate area of a company. Due to the change in the areas of interest of these professionals, this article will discuss the knowledge you must have about a lawyer before hiring their services.
Make sure to check if the lawyer has obtained a university degree in law. Also have a specialty in corporate law to entirely dominate the issues relating to tax law, contract law, stock market law, accounting, bankruptcy, property rights, zoning laws, licensing laws and the laws specific to the business that they work for. It is essential that the person you hire to work in this area has experience, either because they have worked in another company in the corporate department or because they have completed an internship in law.
The lawyer of your company must have the ability to communicate correctly, both orally and in writing because he will be responsible for representing you in any type of legal situation that the company is involved. Also, to handle tax issues, commercial contracts, legal rights, and obligations, including the responsibilities of corporate officers of the company. The important thing about this choice is to feel safe with the person who is managing your company in the legal aspect, because of your capacity will depend on the vision you have about the opportunities and risks of your business.
In case you do not want or can not, due to the cost involved, hire a professional who works as a permanent employee, you can approach a firm that performs this type of service instead. Attending a trial under the direction of a lawyer can make the difference between your guilt or your innocence. While it is true that in certain legal proceedings, it is not mandatory to attend with a lawyer, but it is highly recommended.
See as an example of what is reported in the present body, the new sentence where the defendant is the one who goes to trial with a lawyer and not the complainant. Although as a prior question the lawyer requested the file of the procedure to consider the lack of criminal offence, not being admitted by opposing the complaining party, the defendant is finally acquitted of the misdemeanour of mistreatment without injury and is ordered to pay the costs.